Submission 1

Row #	Pass / No Pass	Comments	Collegeboard
1	No Pass	Adequate explanation of the functionality of the code’s Input and Output. Video clearly shows funtional code and input. No Pass because the program’s purpose is its functionality.	0
2	No Pass	There is no data abstraction shown in the Written Response. No new data is shown to be stored in a list.	1
3	No Pass	There is an attempt to manage complexity. Though, there is only one use case for each item in the list, so there is no reason to have a list.	0
4	Pass	The function created relates to the program’s functionality and purpose. It is well explained and meets the CollegeBoard criteria.	1
5	Pass	The student created function includes iteration and meets all other CollegeBoard criteria.	1
6	Pass	The function took two calls and responded with appropriate responses. Both responses used different parts of the code in the function.	1

2 - I focused too much on the functionality of the list. This section was mostly to identify that a list was used.

Submission 2

Row #	Pass / No Pass	Comments	Collegeboard
1	Pass	Adequate explanation of the functionality of the code’s Input and Output. Video clearly shows funtional code and input.	1
2	Pass	The program used a list to abstract the data in use.	1
3	Pass	This is a great example of managing complexity due to the high amount of individual values.	1
4	Pass	The function created relates to the program’s functionality and purpose. It is well explained and meets the CollegeBoard criteria.	1
5	Pass	I can tell just by how many loops are being used that there is definitely iteration.	1
6	Pass	The function took two calls and responded with appropriate responses. Both responses used different parts of the code in the function.	1